The Lord of the Rings the Fellowship of the Rings Theatrical Version Review

Reviews

Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring

We invest Hobbits with qualities that cannot exist visualized. In my mind, they are skillful-hearted, bustling, communicative little creatures who live in twee houses or burrows, and wearing apparel like the merry men of Robin Hood--in smaller sizes, of grade. They eat seven or eight times a day, like to take naps, take never been far from home and have optics that grow broad at the sounds of the night. They are like children grown upward or grown old, and when they rising to an occasion, it takes true heroism, for they are timid past nature and would rather avoid a fight.

Such notions about Hobbits can be found in "Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Band," only the Hobbits themselves have been pushed off center phase. If the books are about brave little creatures who enlist powerful men and wizards to help them in a dangerous crusade, the movie is about powerful men and wizards who embark on a dangerous crusade, and have along the Hobbits. That is not true of every scene or episode, simply by the end "Fellowship" adds upwards to more of a sword and sorcery epic than a realization of the more naive and guileless vision of J. R. R. Tolkien.

The Ring Trilogy embodies the kind of innocence that belongs to an earlier, gentler time. The Hollywood that made "The Wizard of Oz" might have been equal to information technology. But "Fellowship" is a moving picture that comes subsequently "Gladiator" and "Matrix," and information technology instinctively ramps up to the genre of the overwrought special-effects action picture. That it transcends this genre--that information technology is a well-crafted and sometimes stirring adventure--is to its credit. But a true visualization of Tolkien's Center-globe it is not.

Wondering if the trilogy could perchance exist equally action-packed as this film, I searched my memory for sustained activity scenes and finally turned to the books themselves, which I had not read since the 1970s. The chapter "The Bridge of Khazad-Dum" provides the ground for perchance the nearly sensational activity scene in the film, in which Gandalf the magician stands on an unstable rock bridge over a chasm, and must engage in a deadly swordfight with the monstrous Balrog. This is an exciting scene, done with state-of-the-art special furnishings and sound that shakes the theater. In the volume, I was not surprised to discover, the entire scene requires less than 500 words.

Settling down with my book, the ane-volume, 1969 India paper edition, I read or skimmed for an hour or so. It was as I remembered information technology. The trilogy is by and large well-nigh leaving places, going places, being places, and going on to other places, all amid fearful portents and speculations. There are a smashing many mountains, valleys, streams, villages, caves, residences, grottos, bowers, fields, high roads, low roads, and along them the Hobbits and their larger companions travel while paying great attention to mealtimes. Landscapes are described with the true-blue detail of a Victorian travel author. The travelers meet foreign and fascinating characters along the mode, some of them friendly, some of them not, some of them of an gild far above Hobbits or even men. Sometimes they must fight to defend themselves or to continue possession of the band, but more often than not the trilogy is an unfolding, a quest, a journey, told in an elevated, archaic, romantic prose style that tests our capacity for the declarative vox.

Reading information technology, I remembered why I liked information technology in the first identify. It was reassuring. You could tell past holding the book in your hands that in that location were many pages to go, many sights to see, many adventures to share. I cherished the way it paused for songs and poems, which the movie has no time for. Like The Tale of Genji, which some say is the first novel, "The Lord of the Rings" is not about a narrative arc or the growth of the characters, but well-nigh a long series of episodes in which the essential nature of the characters is demonstrated again and once more (and again). The ring, which provides the purpose for the journey, serves Tolkien as the ideal MacGuffin, motivating an epic quest while mostly staying right there on a chain around Frodo Baggins' cervix.

Peter Jackson, the New Zealand director who masterminded this film (and two more to follow, in a $300 million undertaking), has fabricated a work for, and of, our times. It will be embraced, I suspect, by many Tolkien fans and take on aspects of a cult. It is a candidate for many Oscars. Information technology is an crawly production in its daring and breadth, and at that place are small touches that are simply correct; the Hobbits may non look like my idea of Hobbits (may, indeed, look like full-sized humans fabricated to seem smaller through visual trickery), but they have the right combination of twinkle and pluck in their gaze--especially Elijah Wood as Frodo and Ian Holm as the worried Bilbo.

Even so the taller characters seem to stand astride the little Hobbit world and steal the story away. Gandalf the skillful wizard (Ian McKellen) and Saruman the treacherous wizard (Christopher Lee) and Aragorn (Viggo Mortensen), who is the warrior known as Strider, are then well-seen and acted, and so fearsome in boxing, that we can't imagine the Hobbits getting anywhere without them. The elf Arwen (Liv Tyler), the Elf Queen Galadriel (Cate Blanchett) and Arwen'due south male parent, Elrond (Hugo Weaving), are not small like literary elves ("very alpine they were," the book tells us), and here they tower like Norse gods and goddesses, accompanied by so much dramatic sound and lighting that it's a wonder they can call back to speak, with all the distractions.

Jackson has used modern special effects to great purpose in several shots, specially one where a massive wall of water forms and reforms into the wraiths of charging stallions. I like the manner he handles crowds of Orcs in the big boxing scenes, wisely knowing that in a motion-picture show of this kind, realism has to be tempered with a certain fanciful fudging. The moving picture is remarkably well made. Simply it does continue, and on, and on--more vistas, more forests, more sounds in the dark, more fearsome creatures, more prophecies, more visions, more dire warnings, more close calls, until we realize this sort of thing tin continue indefinitely. "This tale grew in the telling," Tolkien tells us in the famous commencement words of his foreword; information technology's as if Tolkien, and now Jackson, grew so fond of the journey, they dreaded the destination.

That "Fellowship of the Band" doesn't match my imaginary vision of Center-earth is my problem, not yours. Perchance it will expect exactly as you call up it should. But some may regret that the Hobbits have been pushed out of the foreground and reduced to supporting characters. And the movie depends on activity scenes much more than than Tolkien did. In a statement last week, Tolkien's son Christopher, who is the "literary protector" of his male parent'south works, said, "My own position is that 'The Lord of the Rings' is especially unsuitable to transformation into visual dramatic form." That is probably true, and Jackson, instead of transforming information technology, has transmuted it, into a sword-and-sorcery epic in the mod fashion, containing many of the same characters and incidents.